Sunday, December 13, 2009

Links via Diigo (weekly)

Links of interest for the week ending in December 12, 2009.


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

2 comments:

ibn jubayr said...

i liked Deepa Kumar's talk... very clear and solidly put together, and i thought she ended strong. for instance, the footnote that 30,000 troops are being sent to do more subjugate 100 militants is very telling. beyond the material goals of the occupation, i would only add that the massive troop surge is in response to the popular character of the resistance in Afghanistan. this is something that the Left has engaged with only sparingly although key insights have been offered.

i find it helpful to think about how and where certain information and narratives fit into the multiple layers of the movement.

some conversations can only be had between intellectuals, while others are tailored more for public consumption. in this spectrum, i thought her talk falls into the latter. from another angle, her talk is good for people on the periphery of the movement, or people not in the movement at all. she addressed a lot of what the Right says on a point by point basis and thoroughly debunks it.

i became a little uncomfortable, though, when she began to discuss what could be described as the relatively "progressive" merits of Muslim Empires in comparison to European imperialism.

in her broader narrative i see what she was trying to do -- shatter the myth that barbarism is inherently and solely a Muslim or Islamic phenomenon -- but how would an Amernian person respond to notions that the Ottoman Empire was a progressive force?

with these things in mind, it's worth thinking about what other adjunct narratives and poles need to be built within the anti-war movement. if Deepa is holding down the "popular conceptions" front as a sort of counterweight to white-supremacist notions popularized in the bourgeois press, what other poles need to be built at the center of the movement? what about brown folks?

i raise this because Nidal Hasan, and now those 5 young guys from Virginia represent what could be seen as a weakness in the spectrum of Muslim/Islamic/brown/South Asian/Arab/etc. political thought. what organizational alternatives being offered to these people instead of conservative Islamic movements in the case of the 5 guys form Virginia, or individual instances of lashing out in the case of Nidal Hasan.

in my head part of this narrative begins with studying out own movements and historical figures in part to learn from them and in part to vindicate them from white supremacist attacks. this is only one piece of the puzzle though.

ibn jubayr said...

i want to offer a corrective to my comment when i said, "some conversations can only be had between intellectuals,"

what i meant to say is that there are certain conversations that cannot be had by folks with only a cursory knowledge of the topic.